When All the Answers Are in AI, Are We Still Curious?
Casal dels Infants – AI has now become the instant answer to almost everything, replacing the process of thinking and the natural sense of curiosity. Phrases like “Just ask ChatGPT!” are now common, even among elementary school children. In the past, curiosity sparked lively classroom discussions or explorations with teachers. Now, within just a few seconds on a phone screen, a smart chatbot can provide all the answers.
Yet behind this convenience lies a bigger question: Are our children still truly learning and thinking deeply?
Child clinical psychologist Sarah Aurelia Saragih has observed a major shift in how children learn since AI became widespread. Children start using AI as early as ages 8–10, initially for entertainment or completing school assignments. By early adolescence (ages 12–14), AI becomes a source of answers about identity and personal matters. In late adolescence (ages 15–18), its role grows even further, becoming an emotional confidant, a decision-making assistant, and even a guide in searching for life’s meaning.
“Read More: Family Vacation Inspiration, Must-Visit Child-Friendly Destinations”
“Teenagers are both critical and vulnerable. When AI becomes the primary source of answers, the process of reflection can easily be pushed aside,” Sarah explained.
AI is not the enemy. Educational chatbots can be a fun way to learn science or languages. However, when children merely copy answers without understanding the concepts, their thinking pathways are disrupted.
They no longer practice essential cognitive skills such as reflection, problem-solving, or planning. “The real danger isn’t that AI makes them lazy, it’s that they lose the opportunity to think deeply,” said Sarah.
This phenomenon is known as cognitive offloading, where the brain delegates heavy mental work to an external system. According to clinical psychologist Arnold Lukito, this can even affect the brain physically.
“Neuropsychological research has shown a decrease in activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), the part of the brain responsible for planning and problem-solving,” Arnold noted. As a result, children become passive recipients of information, without questioning it further.
The effects are often not immediately visible. Grades remain good, assignments get done quickly, and teachers are pleased. But beneath the surface, motivation to learn slowly fades.
“They’re used to finding answers through AI, not through exploration or discussion,” Arnold said.
Some even begin questioning the purpose of learning itself: Why bother thinking when AI can give all the answers? This mindset is called instrumental mindset, focusing only on results such as exam scores and rankings, with no regard for the process.
“If left unchecked, children will lose academic meaning and the spirit of mastery, the satisfaction of understanding something through their own effort,” Arnold warned.
The solution is not to ban AI, but to guide its use reflectively. Arnold suggests encouraging children to ask deeper follow-up questions:
Such questions train metacognition, the ability to think about one’s own thinking, which is a critical foundation for intelligence.
Education systems must also adapt. Adding technology alone is not enough; there must still be space for discussion, exploration, and critical thinking. Children need to learn how to:
“Technology always has two sides, it offers convenience but also challenges our fundamental human abilities,” Arnold noted.
AI, for all its intelligence, cannot replace curiosity, perseverance, and the learning process that shapes character. If children grow up with the habit of ‘ask AI, then move on’, we are not creating a generation of thinkers, but rather a generation that has lost its curiosity.
“And if curiosity disappears, doesn’t that mean we are losing one of the very essences of being human?” Arnold concluded.
“Continue Reading: 10 Countries with the Lowest Life Expectancy in the World”
